Bookish (and not so Bookish) Thoughts
The Solace of Open Spaces
Bookish Banter- The Last Chairlift by John Irving
Look at us! Julie and I got through the nearly 900 page newest John Irving book, The Last Chairlift, during the start of the holiday season! There are some spoilers in here, be warned!
Julz: This is the first time I’ve ever read Irving “hot off the presses.” It was quirky and cute and vulgar and fun. And of course, all the sex. And of course there were some slightly odd anecdotes like “the kiss of questionable judgment” that Ray gave to Adam (ew) and the fact that Adam slept with his dad’s wife. Um yeah.
Christine: I could get over the stepmom sex, since he didn’t grow up with her (Julz: Agreed), but the boundaries between Adam and Ray were a bit too poorly defined for me at times (Julz: Also, agreed). I thought the expression Em’s sexuality was interesting too, the fact that she expressed herself so loudly in the heat of the moment and was silent the rest of the time was such a deliberate commentary on the importance sex, and even intimacy as a whole, played in the book. Also intentional was his lack of discussion about Adam’s sex with Grace. What did you think of her?
Julz: I liked Em, especially when she started speaking. The pantomime thing didn’t work too well in writing. I’m glad she and Adam could support each other as spouses and writers.
I thought it was hilarious that it was the crazy wedding weekend (yeast infections, lesbians, orgasms, electrocutions) that Adam, “… decided to adopt an uncharacteristic nonchalance. I would henceforth appear to understand, or be indifferent to, everything.” That was a hell of a weekend…
Christine: That section was one of my favorites! Can you imagine it as a movie? Such shenanigans. So much of the story grew from that weekend- Ray and Mr. Barlow’s relationships, Nora and Em’s sexuality, ghosts, Molly’s role in their lives (loved her, by the way), etc…
Julz: The only people in Adam’s life who appear to have died natural deaths were Nana and Molly (despite her best efforts). Think about all of the outrageous ways people died like the diaper man previously mentioned. Aunts, scared to death by ghost. Uncles drive off cliff, possibly deliberately. The elder Barlows crushed by a train in an avalanche. Clara jumps from a chairlift. Nora and Paul Goode are shot at two very different venues and Adam witness both. Plus Vietnam and AIDS. Irving is certainly creatives in how he kills his characters.
Although, honestly, I was glad to see Mr. Barlow and Ray commit suicide by six-pack and hypothermia. I don’t think I could have witnessed Ray’s death by cancer. Hell no.
Christine: It was very reminiscent of poor Owen Meany’s mom…
I agree, and it would have been so out of character for her to just succumb. There really was so much loss in the book, which for Adam as a writer gave him a lot of material, but to look at it spelled out like that it’s really sad, too. This isn’t a sad story, though, with a lot of grieving. What do you make of Irving’s intent there?
Julz: I think Irving’s presentation of loss is to demonstrate that at some point in everyone’s life, it’s going to happen. You will lose the people you love in some way or another and life goes on for the living. Shit, look at the year I’ve had.
Why is Irving so obsessed with small men? The way he gushes over Mr. Barlow, he would adore my husband!
Christine: Ha! Again, Owen Meany vibes! (Julz: Totally!) I googled Irving’s height and he was 5’8”, so maybe it comes from some personal insecurities? Not that that is that short, but maybe it felt that way growing up?
Julz: What did you think of the screenplay as narrative device? I found it distracting at first, especially with all the ghosts in scenes. I did get used to it after a while, and though it made for quicker reading, I was relieved when it switched back.
Christine: This was definitely something I wanted to talk about, and I felt the same way. I know Irving has written screenplays, so this wasn’t coming from somewhere completely random, but I connect with his prose so much more. I feel that way about literature as a whole, though, I much rather read a novel than a play!
Confession: I really didn’t love the ghost angle, minus his grandfather’s. I was glad that it didn’t take over the text. It wasn’t done poorly or anything, just personal preference
Names were so important! Adam, Grace, Rachel being shortened to Ray, Em’s name also being shortened by Nora, the plentiful descriptors for Mr. Barlow, etc.. Obviously this isn’t anything new, but I enjoyed deciphering the meanings.
Julz: Yeah, I prefer prose any day. I could have done without the ghost angle, too, except (besides the diaper man) maybe Paul Goode’s mom at the hotel. And yes, I’m glad you mentioned the descriptors! The snowshoer, the night groomer, etc. Those were endearing.
Bookish (and not so Bookish) Thoughts
I finally finished John Irving's The Last Chairlift- Julz and I have a post coming in the near future for inquiring minds. I enjoyed it, but at nearly 900 pages it was a tad long.
Today is my birthday and I got lots of new books from my husband. Our birthday/Christmas strategy is very simple- set limits and exchange wish lists. It works!
Part of me is getting a little concerned about my Goodreads goals for the year, and part of me knows I always pull it off and will be totally fine. Please note that no part of me whatsoever thinks this whole goal is contrived and unimportant.
The last week has been A LOT, some in good ways and some not. Sawyer got a cold that turned into something more, which antibiotics helped with quickly, but then in turn bothered his stomach. I got in a car accident on Friday (a lady turned left in front of me when we both had just normal green lights... everyone is fine, but my car will be in the shop for a whilllllle... the whole thing has been pretty stressful). My mom was down for a few days and now my sister and her husband are with us through the holiday (these are good things). Scott came back from almost two weeks out of the country and I've been trying to catch up with work so I can go into the last few weeks in a good spot.
Since my life isn't hectic enough, I decided to train for a half-marathon in February. It's one I've done six or so times before and I'm in good cardiovascular health, but I just forgot how much time the training schedule requires, especially since I am very slow. I needed a goal, though, a reason to push myself. So, here we are.
Mysterious plastic babies started showing up in my classroom, the ones that are baked in to cakes for The Epiphany. Now it's become this huge running jokes and I have taken a little container of them home for my house for Thanksgiving break, since my students agree they needed constant protection. Let's just say since I started making them the stars of my Insastories I've gotten a lot of new followers (my teacher account)... apparently they'd rather see them then get book recs? As if.
Yellowstone is back! If they just focused on Beth and Rip 90% of each episode that would be fine.
I am not into decorating for Christmas on the outside of my house, but let's just say I've added another tree to my indoors, bringing out total to three (plus a big one in my classroom, so I guess I own four!).
The one in my classroom is for the extra credit literary ornament that my students are hopefully working on. It's one of my favorite classroom holiday traditions and I can't wait to see them!
Bookish (and not so Bookish) Thoughts
It's pouring outside here in Southern California and in many other parts of the state (plus feet of snow in the mountains!)- we need it a million times over, but I must say I don't like it. I appreciate it, but I don't like it. I can't walk my dog, traffic is abysmal, and I walk around staring at my ceiling, since I just know it's going to start leaking (it's who I am).
It's Election Night and I'm avoiding the news. I know it's not going to be great and I rather get it all in one chunk tomorrow rather than lots of disappointing tidbits tonight. There are some local and state issues that I feel more optimistic about, at least.
My husband is away for nearly two weeks out of the country for work, so I'm holding down the fort with a loud, chatty eight-year-old. Thoughts and prayers, please.
Coincidentally, the day my husband left to fly halfway across the world, is also out anniversary (we went out over the weekend, so it's all good). Marriage is really, really hard- not the part about being monogamous, the part about two different people with two very different personalities living in one space and making a life together. It's just tough, some years are very, very tough. Luckily, this year has been the easiest of them all- out of all fourteen of them!
Last month Sawyer and I took a weekend trip to Sequoia National Park and it was such a great weekend away. We drove to Visalia Friday afternoon, stayed the night there, hiked all of Saturday in the forest, and drove back in time for his swim lessons on Sunday (it's about four hours without traffic). The drive from the park entrance to the biggest tree (by volume), General Sherman, was incredibly windy but kind of a fun drive.
I just finished Thomas Hardy's Woodlanders for a research project I'm doing with my students and while it isn't best, there was a certain college-nostalgia I had while reading it. I took a class on Hardy at UCLA and just the idea of knowing I was going to write a paper on the book while I read it took me wayyyyy back.
I'm listening to Matthew Perry's memoir and...damn. It's really good, but really heavy.
I'm looking forward to lots of family time this month! We actually hung out with some of my husband's family, who we haven't see in years, a few weeks ago and then my mom comes in little over a week, and then when she leaves my sister and her husband are coming. Maybe I'll squeeze in a visit with my grandpa, too, and a cousin and I are trying to calendar some time to get lunch. Tis the season!
Celeste Ng Reading
Bookish (and not so Bookish) Thoughts
Bookish (and not so Bookish) Thoughts
Bookish (and not so Bookish) Thoughts
Bookish (and not so Bookish) Thoughts
Bookish Banter: Middlesex
Hey! It's me! I'm alive! Until my next update, here's a conversation between Julz and I about a reread for both of us- Jeffrey Eugenides' Middlesex. It's hard for me to reread things, since there are just sooooo many books to read as is, but I always walk away with a new, deeper understanding and appreciation that I should do it more often.
Christine: Obviously fate versus free will is a huge thematic component in the text, which is a nice tie back to the classical references and ancestry. Then there’s also the idea of nature versus nurture, which is an interesting extension of that concept. How much control did the characters have of their lives? Their futures?
Julz: I think free will was more prevalent than fate. Sure, there were things that were beyond the characters’ control, like civil unrest and the goings on of the wider world, but every decision they made shaped the lives of their family. Like, um, marrying your brother!
I could totally relate to Callie here: “Gradually as most of the other girls in my grade began to undergo their own transformations, I began to worry less about possible accidents and more about being left behind, left out.” That was so me until my junior year of high school.
Christine: Father Mike and Jimmy Zizmo both marry into the family and end up showing their corruption (although Zizmo is much more overt and immediate). Both are religious figures and are outsiders- what do you think Eugenides is saying about those not blood related to the family? Or even religion (I know Zizmo’s organization wasn’t exactly traditional)?
Julz: I think the way Eugenides addressed religion made it sound more like superstition and it felt like he was rolling his eyes at the concept of organized religion. Maybe that’s why he portrayed Mike and Jimmy as corrupt, as they were a reflection of those institutions. Hmmm?
Christine: Agreed! Speaking of secondary male characters, what do you think of Dr. Luce? Part of me hated him for treating Cal as a mere specimen, but if I try to look at things objectively, he’s a scientist and this is a really, really different time period when it comes to sexuality and patient transparency.
Julz: Well, that can circle back to the nature versus nurture concept. Luce was convinced that despite her maleness, Cal could continue as female because that’s how she was nurtured. I didn’t really feel strongly either way with how Luce handled Cal. I think he expressed enough compassion toward her, and yet, there was a bit of detachment when studying her. Hey, it was the 70’s they were all probably smoking cigarettes in his office.
Christine: I loved this book, despite forgetting a lot of it (I did read a really long time ago, in my defense), but I had one criticism, and that was of some of the symbolism being a bit too obvious, namely the spoon and the house address. Any nitpicky problems?
Julz: I didn’t think Eugenides was hitting me over the head with symbolism any more than say, John Irving. I read it probably 15 years ago, and it was pretty much like reading it for the first time again. This book definitely cemented my love for multigenerational family epics (unabashed plug for Ursula, Under by Ingrid Hill).
My one irritation was that we didn’t get the punchline to Cal referring to her brother as Chapter Eleven until the very end.
And funny enough, the first time I read this book, I highlighted the following (about the house on Middlesex Boulevard): “…communism, better in theory than reality.” I’m guessing I did that because it’s so similar to a quote from the Simpsons.
Christine: I will have to check that one out. I always say that I don’t like them and then end up eating my words, hah!
Bookish (and not so Bookish) Thoughts
A Few Things About... Happy-Go-Lucky by David Sedaris
A Few Things About... No One is Talking About This by Patricia Lockwood
"Was that Satisfying?"
A Few Things About... This Time Tomorrow by Emma Straub
A Few Things About... Talk to Me by TC Boyle
A Few Things About... Election and Tracy Flick Can't Win by Tom Perrotta
I love Tracy Flick in both, and I think there are things I identify with in her adult character. I understand deciding on a different career path than originally intended, measuring your self-worth by your productivity, and stifling your emotions to plow forward and save face (don’t I sound like so much FUN? haha). I also loved that she ended up in education, since I can definitely relate to that.
Perrotta’s format is similar for both- he ties a cast of characters together, examining intricacies of their lives, allowing the reader to empathize in situations we might not otherwise. The only drawback is that in the second one, especially, I would have liked to see maybe one or two threads left out and more depth with others.
The ending of Tracy Flick was definitely written for a movie in mind… let’s just keep it at that