I just finished The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky and found it strangely familiar. Hmmm, what other book ends with the protagonist being in a mental hospital partly due to being unable to cope with a family member's death? And struggles with making friends, sex, and all those general coming-of-age issues? Oh! Yes! That's right, I remember!
And so I decided to make this fun chart:
 |
| [Just off the top of my head] |
It's not a bad book, by any means, nor is it a total rip off of The Catcher in the Rye, it just borrows heavily. It's like when a young girl goes into her older sister's closet and "borrows" her dress, sweater, earrings, jacket, and purse, stopping short at taking her underwear. Chbosky definitely borrowed from his big brother Salinger, but did throw in his own belt, cufflinks and whatever else men wear. There are differences, but there's just so much that they have in common! I was willing to give Perks a chance since I see it as one of the original YA books- it was published in 1999, far before the current genre craze. And if I had never read Catcher I probably would have liked it just fine, I just can't experience the same level of appreciation reading the two almost back-to-back, seeing the glaring similarities.
Oddly, I have high hopes for the movie (I haven't seen it yet).
I still need to read this book!! I was completely in love with the movie trailer and decided that I will read the book first!! :P Still need to do both :P
ReplyDeleteI watched the movie last year and I really liked it. I have never read the book, so I couldn't tell you if the movie made major changes.
ReplyDeleteThe Perks of Being a Wallflower was published in 1999.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteSorry about the type- still way ahead of the current YA curve, though!
DeleteI'm interested in your take on these two books. I read them both years apart and don't really see them as being similar beyond superficial elements like both being about angsty teenage boys. Wallflower is so rooted in the '90s and '90s music and culture, and I think Charlie's issues were a lot deeper than Holden's and his voice was much more likable. I see them as having essentially opposite personalities too-Holden as a loud slacker and Charlie as a geeky introvert. But I'm sure that you picked up more having read them so close together nad of course it's likely Salinger was an influence on Chbosky.
ReplyDeleteI think if I had read them years and years apart I probably wouldn't have caught so much. And like I said, there are differences, but some major (and minor) things are just so similar. And I don't think Charlie is necessarily a deeper character than Holden, I just think Holden is massively unreliable while Charlie is pretty transparent through his letters. I agree, though, Charlie is a much more likable kid- I'd rather teach him than Holden any day!
Delete