Showing posts with label homoerotica. Show all posts
Showing posts with label homoerotica. Show all posts

Sponsored Review- My Education (AKA: Hot Lesbian Sex)

Hot lesbian sex. Three words that if Penguin used in their marketing campaign Susan Choi's My Education would be an instant New York Times Bestseller (and will simultaneously lead a lot of pervy men to blog... sorry guys). 

But, then again, who really wants to be a NYT Bestseller? For crap's sake Nicholas Sparks and Danielle Steele are on that list. Besides, My Education is far, far better than the normal riffraff that finds it's way up there.

Back to the lesbians. 

Regina Gottlieb is a young graduate student that becomes a TA for a notorious professor on campus, Nicholas Brodeur. Rumors fly about his sexual liaisons with students and tumultuous marriage with his expecting wife, Martha. Regina looks past this and falls into the comfortable routine of attending her own classes, assisting a Chaucer class, and developing a friendship with her roommate Dutra (with the occasional benefit ifyaknowwhatImean). Months later, she is at a party at Brodeur's home when sparks fly between Regina and Martha (who has since delivered her son). A passionate affair commences, Martha leaving her baby with the nanny and eventually asking Nicholas for a separation.

From the start it is apparent that Regina is far more invested in the blossoming relationship than Martha is. The story becomes one of obsession- Regina's only purpose in life is to be the other half of Martha. She drops out of school and fails to maintain any other relationships, her only focus is on her lover, who refuses to acknowledge her presence in public or with her estranged husband.

Eventually their affair is violently and mortally rocked. Regina must cope with loneliness and heartache- she must now return focus to herself. The book fast-forwards over a decade in the future and the reader is able to see how Regina's life has panned out and how the people of her past are still a part of her present.

The writing in this book was both a strength and a weakness. Choi's prose is complex and deliberate. Her vocabulary is extensive and her descriptions thoughtful. Yet at times there was a hint of pretension that surpassed Regina's voice and blurred into that of the writer's.

The issue of sexuality in this novel was quite fascinating. Both women appear to be bisexual, given their pasts and futures. But their relationships and what it means transcends sexuality, with different implications for both women. Regina, as much as I wanted to find depth to her, really was just a young student trying to find herself. She was in a new town, didn't seem to have many friends, had an overbearing mother, and was unsure of herself- her becoming unhealthily attracted to an intelligent, attractive, older woman who was basically the opposite of her own mother (I'm still trying to decide if there are "mommy issues" at play here- perhaps feelings of abandonment? A desire to change and replace?), wasn't surprising. And Martha? She was unhappily married and confined to motherhood- she needed an out with actually having to go out. At first glance it may seem like an unlikely pairing, but with further review it really is not. Frankly, my favorite character actually ended up being Dutra- his laid back charisma and sharp intellect were far more interesting than these two tortured women.

The dynamics of age is also worth a glance. Regina is immature, partly due to the fact that she is only twenty-one, younger than her peers. She's not equipped to handle much of what is thrown at her throughout the course of her book, whether the object of her desire was female or male. Martha, who is in her early thirties, wants to be young, like Regina. She misses her obligation-free days and the scandalous affair she has began with one of her husband's young female students is a glimpse back to that time period. Essentially, she's going through a midlife crisis a bit too early. (And her name- Martha! The name of an eighty-year-old! Her character's persona was so much older than she actually was.)

Don't mistake my frustration as criticism, though. These sorts of accusations and questions are what make the book interesting and thought-provoking (hello, book clubs!). While it did take me twenty or so pages to get invested in the story, once I got into the meat of the book I enjoyed it. While it may not be for everyone, being a little racy and a bit wordy, I do recommend it to those who enjoy Chabon, Cunningham, or Messud.  

Disclosure: Penguin may have generously sent me this copy, but all opinions are my own.

April Reviews- Living Forever, Race, Homosexuality, and Running Over Kids

So this happened (somehow):

Our Tragic Universe by Scarlett Thomas
324 pages
I hoped this book was going to be better than it ended up being; it was about an English writer who writes serial fiction while trying to hammer our her overdue "real" novel. She ends up reading a book mistakenly (she is also a reviewer) and ends up semi-tackling the idea of whether we can live forever, while contemplating having an affair. This doesn't sound completely horrible, but the fact that at times it's downright boring ruins the novel as a whole. It could be worse, but it could have been much better. The cover is pretty cool, though. 

Verdict: Pass

A Single Man by Christopher Ishwerwood
192 pages
This groundbreaking novel was written during the 1960s in a time where homosexuality wasn't exactly embraced (not that it completely is today), which is just one of the reasons why I really appreciated it. It tells the story of a man whose partner has died and he must still live his everyday life while grieving and deciding how to fulfill his desires. The borderline novella takes place within one day, something that can be tough to do effectively for some authors. Yes it is a movie, and now I haven't seen it.

Verdict: I think it's a quick, interesting read. If you find homosexuality offensive READ IT ANYWAY and get up to speed with the twenty-first century

Carry the One by Carol Anshaw
272 pages
This will definitely be on my second annual "reading by the water" list. It was a decent read- not overly challenging, but not crap. It tells the story of a group of people that end up hitting, and killing, a little girl on the way home from a wedding. The story tracks them over the next few decades; which is where my problems with the book arise. I think the plot stays interesting, but Anshaw doesn't do the best job creating a cohesive text from beginning to end.

Verdict: If you like plot driven books than this is a good one for you; it stays pretty high-interest throughout. 

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
376 pages
I had to reread this for work, and I have to say it was a damn good thing I decided to. I remembered very little! This actually causes me great anxiety (like seriously, for reals, no joke) - what else have I forgotten?

Verdict: If you enjoy a good racial satire go for it. Honestly, everyone should read it at one time or another!

All Will Be Revealed by Robert Anthony Siegel
280 pages
Every time I think about the title of this book I start humming Kashmir by Led Zeppelin... Anyway, this novel was surprisingly really, really good. The main character owns a turn of the century pornographic catalog that allows men to order prints to "enjoy" at home. One of his models loses her baby and he ends up in contact with a psychic of sorts that changes his life. While this description makes the whole novel sound like a dirty fraud, I promise that it's really so much more than smut (in fact, it is never sexually graphic, as that's really not what the book is about). Well written and really interesting.

Verdict: If you're hoping for soft core porn, definitely don't even attempt this book, since it's anything but. If you're in the mood for something a little old-fashioned, slightly scandalous, and you like mental hospitals, you may enjoy it. 

The Barbarian Nurseries by Hector Tobar
432 pages
This was definitely my favorite book this month, as it reminded me a little of T.C. Boyle. This book is about a upper-class Orange County family that is slowly going broke. They accidentally/temporarily abandon their two children in the care of their Mexican (and illegal) nanny. The book ends up becoming a vehicle for discussing race, politics, immigration, class and marriage. It's definitely Tortilla Curtain's 2012 counterpart (well, 2011, since that was when it was published).

Verdict: I think everyone should read it, liberal or not. There is more to illegal immigration that one assumes.

I have my doubts how much I'll read in May, considering I feel like I'm drowning in work-related things right now (not in a bad way, I just have a lot to do).

Ch-Ch-Changes

I'm not even a Davie Bowie fan, but it was the only thing I could come up with. I actually I think I like The Flight of the Concord's song "Bowie in Space" more than his actual music ("Receiving transmissions from David Bowie's nipple antennae" gets me every time). My husband sang this song for weeks straight and played the soundtrack for even longer, so I had it stuck in my head for probably two months straight. Crap, now I'm singing about David Bowie's boobies. Oh hell, for your enjoyment:



And now the 95% of you that don't "get it" have either moved on to more civilized blogs or have un-followed me all together.

Let's try this again.

Focus restored.

Check out the two new tabs I've added recently- "About Me" (which unfortunately doesn't shed any light as to why I'm obsessed with cereal, why I think motorcycle gangs are neat, or my obsession with blimps ) and "The Ultimate To-Do List," where I've listed all the books I own but haven't read yet. I also changed a few things on the right, but those aren't really important.

And yes, it was necessary to ramble on about David Bowie and include a youtube video for something that probably didn't really need an actual blog post.

Love Me Some Homoerotic Victorian Lit

In honor of new, uncensored The Picture of Dorian Gray that was released earlier this month, I'd like to climb on my soapbox for a second. I really, really hate the phrase "that's so gay." I'm a heterosexual woman, but I still find the phrase so offensive. What is it supposed to mean? When I hear it in context it's usually being used a synonym for lame, feminine, or corny. It's distasteful and rude.

Okay, I'm done. Well, at least until I receive my copy of And Tango Makes Three next week from Amazon (I fell off the wagon, but had a gift card) and go on and on about book banning and gay penguins.

For those who aren't familiar with The Picture of Dorian Gray by one of my favorite Victorian writers Oscar Wilde, it's about a man so obsessed with youth he wishes a painting would age instead of his actual body. When this actually happens he becomes a very, very naughty boy, partaking in activities that would make the fragile Victorians readers faint (alcohol, drugs, promiscuity, and homosexuality). Wilde's publisher of course toned it down, deciding to cut out most of the homoeroticism. This summary doesn't do the book justice, by the way, so please read it if you have not.

Now, 120 years later, editor Nicholas Frankel is publishing a more uncensored version, adding in more of the original text, as well as a great deal of annotation. Will it be raunchy by today's standards? I highly doubt it. Will it be that much longer of a text? No, rumor has it only five hundred additional words. But, in a time where steps have been taken to "clean up" certain classics, is it a good thing? Absofuckinglutely.

BLOG DESIGN BY DESIGNER BLOGS